[Iowa-dx] Countering Anti-Green Propaganda In P-C
GreenParty Ron
greenpartyron@activist.com
Fri, 4 Jan 2008 22:40:18 -0500
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--_----------=_1199504418303640
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Well, we've already discussed this before, Kelley, last year. As I've
said before, "communism" has nothing at all to do withpolitics or
economics, but the latter stems from the prior. Communism comes from the
ancient Greek word "communiti"which has to do with the way people relate
to each other.Hence, we derive the docile word "community" from
communiti. As an "ism", communism has been re-defined by Royalistswho did
not condone social interaction, since social interactionoften resulted in
complaints against the abuses of the monarchyand in civil and social
rights development. Royalists alsore-defined "socialism", which is the
social control of thepolitical system, which was treason under the
monarchy. Sowe today use improper diction rather than definitions, a
goodpart of which is to blame in our use of "dictionaries" as if theyare
word definition authorities, which they are not. We haveno
"definitionaries" to tell us the correct word use, unfortunately. But you
are correct in the use of "Republifascist" as well as myuse of
"Republicommunist". Both are accurate. My use of theterm
"Republicommunist", however, refers to the mind controlprocess and the
horde of "believers" who subscribe to therepublican form of tyranny. It
is how they relate to each otherand to society outside of their realm.=20
How the Republicommunistsrelate to other societies is either to make them
be economicprostitutes or to bomb them. Ron Kinuma.k.a. Libris Fidelis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kelley Putman"
To: iowa-dx@gp-us.org
Subject: Re: [Iowa-dx] Countering Anti-Green Propaganda In P-C
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 21:08:46 -0600
Ron, Why do you call them "Republicommunists" when their party has no
interest in promoting collective property or the collective good.=20
Admittedly most communist states around the world have not been
successful at collectivization, but it was part of the original premise
of communism/communalism. "Republifascist" would be more accurate I
would think. Kelley
--=20
Got No Time? Shop Online for Great Gift Ideas!
http://mail.shopping.com/?linkin_id=3D8033174
--_----------=_1199504418303640
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D2>Well, we've alrea=
dy discussed this before, Kelley, last year.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D2></FONT> </DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D2>As I've said befo=
re, "communism" has nothing at all to do with</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D2>politics or econo=
mics, but the latter stems from the prior.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D2></FONT> </DI=
V>
<DIV><FONT face=3D"Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size=3D2>Communism comes f=
rom the ancient Greek word "communiti"</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>which has to do with the way people relate=
to each other.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Hence, we derive the docile word "communit=
y" from communiti.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>As an "ism", communism has been re-defined=
by Royalists</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>who did not condone social interaction, si=
nce social interaction</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>often resulted in complaints against the a=
buses of the monarchy</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and in civil and social rights development=
. Royalists also</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>re-defined "socialism", which is the socia=
l control of the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>political system, which was treason under =
the monarchy. So</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>we today use improper diction rather than =
definitions, a good</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>part of which is to blame in our use of "d=
ictionaries" as if they</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>are word definition authorities, which the=
y are not. We have</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>no "definitionaries" to tell us the correc=
t word use, unfortunately.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>But you are correct in the use of "Republi=
fascist" as well as my</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>use of "Republicommunist". Both are =
accurate. My use of the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>term "Republicommunist", however, </FONT><=
FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>refers to the mind control</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>process and the horde of "believers" who s=
ubscribe to the</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>republican form of tyranny. It is ho=
w they relate to each other</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>and to society outside of their realm.&nbs=
p; How the Republicommunists</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>relate to other societies is either to mak=
e them be economic</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>prostitutes or to bomb them.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ron Kinum</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>a.k.a. Libris Fidelis</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #101=
0ff 2px solid">----- Original Message -----<BR>From: "Kelley Putman" <KPUTM=
AN@MCHSI.COM><BR>To: iowa-dx@gp-us.org<BR>Subject: Re: [Iowa-dx] Countering=
Anti-Green Propaganda In P-C<BR>Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 21:08:46 -0600<BR><B=
R>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.3243" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Ron, </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Why do you call them "Republicommunists" w=
hen their party has no interest in promoting collective property or the col=
lective good. Admittedly most communist states around the world =
have not been successful at collectivization, but it was part of the origin=
al premise of communism/communalism. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>"Republifascist" would be more accurate I =
would think.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Kelley</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
--=20
<div> Got No Time? Shop Online for <a href=3Dhttp://mail.shopping.com/?link=
in_id=3D8033174 target=3D"_blank"> <b> Great Gift Ideas!</b></a><br>
mail.com Shopping</div>
--_----------=_1199504418303640--