[Laborgreens] Vets' drug bills may rise

Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:43:30 EST

--part1_26.436feaa2.2d296472_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

EL PASO TIMES
January 2, 2004

Vets' drug bills may soar

By Dale Eisman - The Virginian-Pilot

WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is considering
dramatic increases in the fees military retirees pay for
prescription drugs, a step that would roll back a
benefit extended just 30 months ago and could alienate
an important Republican constituency at the dawn of the
2004 campaign season.

Pentagon budget documents indicate retirees may be asked
to pay $10 - - up from the current $3 -- for each 90-day
generic prescription filled by mail through Tricare, the
military's health insurance program. Tricare's current
$9 co-pay for a three-month supply of each brand-name
drug would jump to $20.

The proposal would also impose charges for drugs the
retirees now receive free at military hospitals and
clinics. There would be a $10 fee for each generic
prescription and a $20 charge for brand-name drugs
dispensed at those facilities.

"You're tampering with a benefit that was earned by
people putting their lives on the line," fumed James F.
Lokovic, a retired Air Force chief master sergeant and
deputy director of the Air Force Sergeants Association.

Lokovic's 136,000-member association has already sent
Bush a letter warning of "significant backlash from
millions of retired military voters" if the plan is
included in the 2005 defense budget the administration
will unveil in a few weeks.

A Pentagon spokesman declined Wednesday to comment on
the drug plan, calling it "pre-decisional." But word of
the proposal was being spread at the speed of light by
veterans service organizations, who were e-mailing their
thousands of members to solicit calls and letters of
protest to the White House and members of Congress.

"It's something that we're going to look at very closely
when we return," said Tom Gordy, chief of staff for Rep.
Ed. Schrock, R-Va. The House is to reconvene on Jan. 20.

"Somebody just isn't paying attention," the Military
Officers Association of America said in a "special
alert" sent to its 390,000 members. "The 'war on
terrorism' is reminding the nation of servicemembers'
sacrifices every night on the evening news ... and yet
the Bush administration seems to continue going out of
its way to penalize the military community."

The Military Officers Association of America alert and
an Internet site run by the Sergeants Association recall
attempts by the Bush administration to impose a $1,200
deductible for care provided to most military retirees
at Veterans Affairs hospitals and the Pentagon's long-
running opposition to bills providing for "concurrent
receipt" of military pension and VA disability payments.

Bush and lawmakers agreed earlier this year on a
concurrent receipt plan, a move widely seen as an
attempt to shore up support for Republicans among
military-minded voters. Military veterans and retirees
are generally seen as providing Bush his 2000 margin of
victory in several key states, including Florida.

The budget documents circulating Wednesday gave no hint
of the current status of the plan or the thinking behind
it. Military retirees -- those who served 20 years or
more -- had no prescription drug coverage until April
2001.

But the documents indicate that the proposed charges
would considerably ease the burden of prescription drug
costs on the defense budget. The new co-pays would
generate more than $728 million in 2005, the Pentagon
estimated, and nearly $4.2 billion by the end of 2009.

The proposed fees also would bring the military's co-
pays into line with those imposed by the VA, the
documents assert.

But spokesmen for veterans groups noted that the VA
fills prescriptions for service-related illnesses and
injuries at no charge.

Its $7 co-pay applies only for medicines given to
outpatients for ailments unrelated to their service. And
even those prescriptions are provided free when the
veteran receiving them has an annual income of less than
$9,690 if single and $12,692 if married.

--part1_26.436feaa2.2d296472_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><HTML><BODY BGCOLOR=3D"#ffffff"><FONT  CO=
LOR=3D"#000040" BACK=3D"#ffffff" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=
=3D2 PTSIZE=3D10 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0">EL PASO TIME=
S<BR>
January 2, 2004<BR>
<BR>
Vets' drug bills may soar<BR>
<BR>
By Dale Eisman - The Virginian-Pilot<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is considering<BR>
dramatic increases in the fees military retirees pay for<BR>
prescription drugs, a step that would roll back a<BR>
benefit extended just 30 months ago and could alienate<BR>
an important Republican constituency at the dawn of the<BR>
2004 campaign season.<BR>
<BR>
Pentagon budget documents indicate retirees may be asked<BR>
to pay $10 - - up from the current $3 -- for each 90-day<BR>
generic prescription filled by mail through Tricare, the<BR>
military's health insurance program. Tricare's current<BR>
$9 co-pay for a three-month supply of each brand-name<BR>
drug would jump to $20.<BR>
<BR>
The proposal would also impose charges for drugs the<BR>
retirees now receive free at military hospitals and<BR>
clinics. There would be a $10 fee for each generic<BR>
prescription and a $20 charge for brand-name drugs<BR>
dispensed at those facilities.<BR>
<BR>
"You're tampering with a benefit that was earned by<BR>
people putting their lives on the line," fumed James F.<BR>
Lokovic, a retired Air Force chief master sergeant and<BR>
deputy director of the Air Force Sergeants Association.<BR>
<BR>
Lokovic's 136,000-member association has already sent<BR>
Bush a letter warning of "significant backlash from<BR>
millions of retired military voters" if the plan is<BR>
included in the 2005 defense budget the administration<BR>
will unveil in a few weeks.<BR>
<BR>
A Pentagon spokesman declined Wednesday to comment on<BR>
the drug plan, calling it "pre-decisional." But word of<BR>
the proposal was being spread at the speed of light by<BR>
veterans service organizations, who were e-mailing their<BR>
thousands of members to solicit calls and letters of<BR>
protest to the White House and members of Congress.<BR>
<BR>
"It's something that we're going to look at very closely<BR>
when we return," said Tom Gordy, chief of staff for Rep.<BR>
Ed. Schrock, R-Va. The House is to reconvene on Jan. 20.<BR>
<BR>
"Somebody just isn't paying attention," the Military<BR>
Officers Association of America said in a "special<BR>
alert" sent to its 390,000 members. "The 'war on<BR>
terrorism' is reminding the nation of servicemembers'<BR>
sacrifices every night on the evening news ... and yet<BR>
the Bush administration seems to continue going out of<BR>
its way to penalize the military community."<BR>
<BR>
The Military Officers Association of America alert and<BR>
an Internet site run by the Sergeants Association recall<BR>
attempts by the Bush administration to impose a $1,200<BR>
deductible for care provided to most military retirees<BR>
at Veterans Affairs hospitals and the Pentagon's long-<BR>
running opposition to bills providing for "concurrent<BR>
receipt" of military pension and VA disability payments.<BR>
<BR>
Bush and lawmakers agreed earlier this year on a<BR>
concurrent receipt plan, a move widely seen as an<BR>
attempt to shore up support for Republicans among<BR>
military-minded voters. Military veterans and retirees<BR>
are generally seen as providing Bush his 2000 margin of<BR>
victory in several key states, including Florida.<BR>
<BR>
The budget documents circulating Wednesday gave no hint<BR>
of the current status of the plan or the thinking behind<BR>
it. Military retirees -- those who served 20 years or<BR>
more -- had no prescription drug coverage until April<BR>
2001.<BR>
<BR>
But the documents indicate that the proposed charges<BR>
would considerably ease the burden of prescription drug<BR>
costs on the defense budget. The new co-pays would<BR>
generate more than $728 million in 2005, the Pentagon<BR>
estimated, and nearly $4.2 billion by the end of 2009.<BR>
<BR>
The proposed fees also would bring the military's co-<BR>
pays into line with those imposed by the VA, the<BR>
documents assert.<BR>
<BR>
But spokesmen for veterans groups noted that the VA<BR>
fills prescriptions for service-related illnesses and<BR>
injuries at no charge.<BR>
<BR>
Its $7 co-pay applies only for medicines given to<BR>
outpatients for ailments unrelated to their service. And<BR>
even those prescriptions are provided free when the<BR>
veteran receiving them has an annual income of less than<BR>
$9,690 if single and $12,692 if married.<BR>
<BR>
Copyright 2004 El Paso Times, Inc.<BR>
http://www.elpasotimes.com/archive.html<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
--part1_26.436feaa2.2d296472_boundary--