[Peace-discussion] New Tilley Boycott Article
michelle
michelle@usol.com
Tue, 08 Aug 2006 00:10:51 -0400
<http://vfpdissident.blogspot.com/2006/08/new-tilley-boycott-article.html>
Monday, August 07, 2006
New Tilley Boycott Article
Virginia Tilley was mentioned in this blog in June; she has a new
article on CounterPunch: "The Case for Boycotting Israel: Boycott Now!"
Here are some excerpts:
... A coordinated movement of divestment, sanctions, and boycotts
against Israel must convene to contain not only Israel's aggressive acts
and crimes against humanitarian law but also, as in South Africa, its
founding racist logics that inspired and still drive the entire
Palestinian problem.
That second goal of the boycott campaign is indeed the primary one.
Calls for a boycott have long cited specific crimes ... But the boycott
cannot target these practices alone. It must target their ideological
source.
The true offence to the international community is the racist
motivation for these practices, which violates fundamental values and
norms of the post-World War II order. That racial ideology isn't subtle
or obscure. Mr. Olmert himself has repeatedly thumped the public podium
about the "demographic threat" facing Israel: the "threat" that too many
non-Jews will - the horror - someday become citizens of Israel. It is
the "demographic threat" that, in Israeli doctrine, justifies sealing
off the West Bank and Gaza Strip as open-air prisons for millions of
people whose only real crime is that they are not Jewish.
...
The raw logic of Israel's distorted self-image and racist doctrines
is expressed beyond confusion by the now-stark reality: the moonscape
rubble of once-lovely Lebanese villages; a million desperate people
trying to survive Israeli aerial attacks as they carry children and
wheel disabled grandparents down cratered roads; the limp bodies of
children pulled from the dusty basements of crushed buildings. This is
the reality of Israel's national doctrine, the direct outcome of its
racist worldview. It is endangering everyone, and it must stop.
...
... don't be confused by liberal Zionist alternatives that argue
against a boycott in favor of "dialogue". If we can draw any conclusion
from the last half-century, it is that, without the boycott, dialogue
will go nowhere. And don't be confused by liberal-Zionist arguments that
Israel will allow Palestinians a state if they only do this or that.
Israel is already the only sovereign power in Palestine: what fragments
are left to Palestinians cannot make a state. The question now is not
whether there is one state, but what kind of state it comprises. The
present version is apartheid, and it must change. However difficult to
achieve, and however frightening to Jewish Israelis, the only just and
stable solution is full democracy.
...
Boycott the Hegemon
This is the moment to turn international pressure on the complicit
US, too. It's impossible, today, to exert an effective boycott on the
United States, as its products are far too ubiquitous in our lives. But
it's quick and easy to launch a boycott of emblematic US products,
upsetting its major corporations. It's especially easy to boycott the
great global consumables, like Coca-Cola, MacDonald's, Burger King, and
KFC, whose leverage has brought anti-democratic pressures on governments
the world over. (Through ugly monopoly practices, Coke is a nasty player
in developing countries anyway: see, for example,
http://www.killercoke.org.)