[Peace-discussion] Marijuana Reform Marching On!

Joni LeViness myths16@cox.net
Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:33:31 -0600


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0077_01C703E2.1ED1D9F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

As a good friend of mine once said, "I've Never seen someone on a Grass High
Standing on the Pool Table, saying Bring it On!"

If sanity such as this prevails, how long before we Outlaw Killing people to
show that killing people is wrong?...

Here's the stats:

Peace and Joy,

Joni LeViness

gpok delegate

DPFOK supporters and friends,

It was a great election night for marijuana reform.

10 out of 13 marijuana reforms passed nationwide!

Please see the results below this message.

The state initiatives failed, but each received 40 percent or more
of the vote!

With the shift in governmental power after last night's nationwide
results, it is only a matter of time for major reform.

There is also the possibility of additional momentum from the
pending lawsuits against federal officials who may have improperly,
if not illegally used federal money to campaign against the
initiatives. For more on this go to: MPP.org

I urge all drug policy reform supporters to keep on marching; we are
closer than ever to major drug policy reform!

Peace 2 ya,

Jeff Pickens

Election 2006: Marijuana Legislation Results

Nevada Question 7
Permit the manufacture, distribution, and sale of marijuana to
adults aged 21 and older
LOSS
44%-56%

Santa Barbara, California Measure P
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority
WIN
65%-35%

Santa Cruz, California Measure K
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority
WIN
64%-36%

Santa Monica, California Measure Y
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority
WIN
65%-35%

Missoula County, Montana Initiative 2
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority
WIN
53%-47%

South Dakota Initiated Measure 4
Allow medical marijuana access
LOSS
48%-52%

Colorado Amendment 44
Allow possession of up to one ounce of marijuana
LOSS
40%-60%

Eureka Springs, Arkansas
Make marijuana possession of one ounce or less the lowest law
enforcement priority
WIN
62%-38%

Albany, California Measure D
Allow a medical marijuana dispensary in the city of Albany
WIN
53%-47%

1st Plymouth Representative District, Massachusetts PPQ #4
Possession of up to one ounce of marijuana should be a civil
violation subject only to a $100 fine
(non-binding policy statement from voters)
WIN
61%-39%

12th Plymouth Representative District,Massachusetts PPQ #4
Possession of up to one ounce of marijuana should be a civil
violation subject only to a $100 fine
(non-binding policy statement from voters)
WIN
60%-40%

7th Norfolk Representative District, Massachusetts PPQ #4
Seriously ill patients should be able to possess and grow marijuana
with a doctor's recommendation (non-binding policy statement from
voters)
WIN
64%-36%

3rd Middlesex Senate District, Massachusetts PPQ #5
Seriously ill patients should be able to possess and grow marijuana
with a doctor's recommendation (non-binding policy statement from
voters)
WIN
67%-33%


------=_NextPart_000_0077_01C703E2.1ED1D9F0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:st1=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)">
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"State"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"City"/>
<o:SmartTagType =
namespaceuri=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:smarttags"
 name=3D"place"/>
<!--[if !mso]>
<style>
st1\:*{behavior:url(#default#ieooui) }
</style>
<![endif]-->
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:Georgia;
	panose-1:2 4 5 2 5 4 5 2 3 3;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
span.Style1
	{color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
	{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
	font-family:Arial;
	color:windowtext;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple>

<div class=3DSection1>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>As a good friend of mine once said, &#8220;I&#8217;ve =
Never
seen someone on a Grass High Standing on the Pool Table, saying Bring it =
On!&#8221;<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>If sanity such as this prevails, how long before we =
Outlaw
Killing people to show that killing people is =
wrong?...<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Here&#8217;s the stats:<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Peace and Joy,<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>Joni LeViness<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'>gpok delegate<o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DGeorgia><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Georgia'>DPFOK supporters and friends,<br>
<br>
It was a great election night for marijuana reform.<br>
<br>
10 out of 13 marijuana reforms passed nationwide!<br>
<br>
Please see the results below this message.<br>
<br>
The state initiatives failed, but each received 40 percent or more<br>
of the vote!<br>
<br>
With the shift in governmental power after last night's nationwide<br>
results, it is only a matter of time for major reform.<br>
<br>
There is also the possibility of additional momentum from the<br>
pending lawsuits against federal officials who may have improperly,<br>
if not illegally used federal money to campaign against the<br>
initiatives. For more on this go to: MPP.org<br>
<br>
I urge all drug policy reform supporters to keep on marching; we are<br>
closer than ever to major drug policy reform!<br>
<br>
Peace 2 ya,<br>
<br>
Jeff Pickens<br>
<br>
Election 2006: Marijuana Legislation Results<br>
<br>
<st1:State w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Nevada</st1:place></st1:State>
Question 7<br>
Permit the manufacture, distribution, and sale of marijuana to<br>
adults aged 21 and older<br>
LOSS<br>
44%-56%<br>
<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Santa Barbara</st1:City>, =
<st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">California</st1:State></st1:place> Measure P<br>
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority<br>
WIN<br>
65%-35%<br>
<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Santa Cruz</st1:City>, =
<st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">California</st1:State></st1:place> Measure K<br>
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority<br>
WIN<br>
64%-36%<br>
<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Santa Monica</st1:City>, =
<st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">California</st1:State></st1:place> Measure Y<br>
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority<br>
WIN<br>
65%-35%<br>
<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Missoula County</st1:City>, =
<st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">Montana</st1:State></st1:place> Initiative 2<br>
Make marijuana possession the lowest law enforcement priority<br>
WIN<br>
53%-47%<br>
<br>
South Dakota Initiated Measure 4<br>
Allow medical marijuana access<br>
LOSS<br>
48%-52%<br>
<br>
<st1:State w:st=3D"on"><st1:place =
w:st=3D"on">Colorado</st1:place></st1:State>
Amendment 44<br>
Allow possession of up to one ounce of marijuana<br>
LOSS<br>
40%-60%<br>
<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Eureka Springs</st1:City>, =
<st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">Arkansas</st1:State></st1:place><br>
Make marijuana possession of one ounce or less the lowest law<br>
enforcement priority<br>
WIN<br>
62%-38%<br>
<br>
<st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Albany</st1:City>, =
<st1:State w:st=3D"on">California</st1:State></st1:place>
Measure D<br>
Allow a medical marijuana dispensary in the city of <st1:City =
w:st=3D"on"><st1:place
 w:st=3D"on">Albany</st1:place></st1:City><br>
WIN<br>
53%-47%<br>
<br>
1st <st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Plymouth Representative =
District</st1:City>,
 <st1:State w:st=3D"on">Massachusetts</st1:State></st1:place> PPQ #4<br>
Possession of up to one ounce of marijuana should be a civil<br>
violation subject only to a $100 fine<br>
(non-binding policy statement from voters)<br>
WIN<br>
61%-39%<br>
<br>
12th <st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Plymouth =
Representative District</st1:City>,<st1:State
 w:st=3D"on">Massachuse<wbr>tts</st1:State></st1:place> PPQ #4<br>
Possession of up to one ounce of marijuana should be a civil<br>
violation subject only to a $100 fine<br>
(non-binding policy statement from voters)<br>
WIN<br>
60%-40%<br>
<br>
7th <st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Norfolk Representative =
District</st1:City>,
 <st1:State w:st=3D"on">Massachusetts</st1:State></st1:place> PPQ #4<br>
Seriously ill patients should be able to possess and grow marijuana<br>
with a doctor's recommendation (non-binding policy statement from<br>
voters)<br>
WIN<br>
64%-36%<br>
<br>
3rd <st1:place w:st=3D"on"><st1:City w:st=3D"on">Middlesex Senate =
District</st1:City>,
 <st1:State w:st=3D"on">Massachusetts</st1:State></st1:place> PPQ #5<br>
Seriously ill patients should be able to possess and grow marijuana<br>
with a doctor's recommendation (non-binding policy statement from<br>
voters)<br>
WIN<br>
67%-33%</span></font><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:Arial'><o:p></o:p></span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------=_NextPart_000_0077_01C703E2.1ED1D9F0--