[Peace-discussion] Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid endorse Democratic Party pro-war agenda "Expert Report" from a Clinton Speech writer

Wed, 6 Sep 2006 09:37:32 -0500

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6D198.14B358D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Democratic Party outlines pro-war agenda for US elections

By Joe Kay

6 September 2006

[...]

The response from the Democratic Party is to argue that they, not the
Republicans, are the more consistent proponents of American "national
security" and "defense," i.e., domestic repression and war.

[...]

These views were outlined in "The Neo Con: The Bush Defense Record by the
Numbers," written by Sharon Burke and Harlan Geer for an organization called
The Third Way National Security Project. The Third Way is a group set up to
provide a "progressive" gloss to right-wing policies. Burke is director of
the National Security Project and was a speechwriter for the Department of
Defense under the Clinton administration.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid
endorsed the report-a fact that makes clear that the policy it outlines
corresponds to the official line of the Democratic Party. It was released
formally at a press conference that included Reid, Democratic Senator Dick
Durbin, General Wesley Clark, and Burke.

The general attitude of the Democrats is made clear from the very beginning
of the report, which cites approvingly comments from William Kristol, one of
the leading ideological figures behind the militarism of the Bush
administration. It quotes Kristol as declaring: "North Korea is firing
missiles. Iran is going nuclear. Somalia is controlled by radical Islamists.
Iraq isn't getting better, and Afghanistan is getting worse...I give the
president a lot of credit for hanging tough on Iraq. But I am worried that
it has made them too passive in confronting the other threats."

This is more or less the position that the Democrats are staking out. The
occupation of Iraq-or rather, the way this occupation is being carried
out-is preventing the US government from dealing with more "pressing"
problems, particularly Iran. A new strategy is needed in Iraq, the Democrats
argue, in order to free the military to deal with these other problems.

"The number of terrorist attacks and recruits are up worldwide," the report
declares, "many of our enemies are stronger; their reach is greater; their
weapons of mass destruction are more developed, plentiful and available. At
the same time, American influence with our allies has weakened: our
'friends' are not with us in Iraq. And a prolonged and troop-intensive war
in Iraq has stretched the military and has left America less able to project
power in troublesome hot spots than before 9-11."

On Iraq, the Third Way report highlights the crisis of the American
occupation, noting that the number of people killed-both Iraqis and American
soldiers-is rising. It declares that Iraq has become a "terrorist haven"
that is on the brink of "full-scale war."

Burke and Geer do not present any alternative to the Bush administration's
policy, and do not call for an end to the occupation. The main position
being advanced by the Democrats, however, is "strategic redeployment"-the
selective transfer of some troops to other areas of Iraq and the Middle
East. Other Democrats are floating the possibility of backing a partition of
the country, which would lead to violence and ethnic cleansing on a massive
scale.

On Tuesday, the Bush administration continued to heighten threats against
Iran, releasing a new "National Strategy for Combating Terrorism" that
declares Iran to be the "most active state sponsor of international
terrorism." In a speech on Tuesday, Bush sought to equate the government of
Iran with Al Qaeda and declared, "The world's free nations will not allow
Iran to develop a nuclear weapon."

There is every reason to believe that the Bush administration is preparing
for some sort of military strike against Iran. What will be the Democratic
Party's response? They would lend crucial support to such an intervention.
The Third Way report criticizes the Bush administration from the right on
Iran, denouncing it for having "outsourced the task of containing Iran's
nuclear program to the Europeans and the UN."

The Bush administration "has been unsuccessful in restraining Iran," it
declares. "At best, Iran is using its nuclear ambition to blackmail western
powers into meeting Iranian demands for economic acceptance and political
influence. At worst, it is determined to possess these weapons to establish
itself as the leader of the Islamic world."

The report also includes a section on China, in which it states, "We may be
losing a potential partner and gaining a serious rival." China has become "a
powerful regional power broker, often acting against the interests of
America in the areas of North Korea and Iran," as well as South America and
Africa. If the US were to take military action against Iran or North Korea
and this led to a confrontation with China, these statements are a clear
indication that the Democrats would support it.

One of the principal aims of the Democrats is to garner the support of a
section of the military that has become increasingly disaffected with the
Bush administration, and particularly Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.
Leading Democrats have in recent days renewed calls for the Bush
administration to replace Rumsfeld. The disaffection comes from sections of
the military brass that are deeply worried that the military as an
institution has been severely undermined. Recruitment is sharply down.
Morale is at all-time lows. Large sections of the military are committed to
the occupation of Iraq, making it difficult for US imperialism to pose a
credible threat to other countries.

"Our superiority is unquestioned," the Third Way report declares. "But over
the past four years, the President has stretched the military to a crisis
point." The report cites many statistics that document this crisis. A new
strategy is needed, the authors conclude, to renew the strength of American
militarism.

One potential answer to what is seen by the Democrats as inadequate troop
strength is the reintroduction of the draft, a possibility that was
suggested by Representative John Murtha on Tuesday. Murtha is known for his
close ties to sections of the military.

Nowhere within the Third Way report, or in any of the comments of leading
Democrats, is there any discussion of the real aims of the war in Iraq and
the threats of war against Iran-namely, the seizure of oil and other natural
resources to give the American ruling class an advantage against potential
rivals, including China. There is no mention of these aims because the
Democratic Party accepts them and agrees with them.

The right-wing position being advanced by the Democrats comes at a time when
polls indicate that two-thirds of the population is against the war in Iraq.
The Democrats are once again demonstrating that they are incapable of
appealing to this sentiment. They have no desire to run in the November
elections on the basis of antiwar sentiment, since this would create
expectations that, being loyal defenders of the interests of American
imperialism, they would be unwilling to fulfill.

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6D198.14B358D0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2963" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=3Dltr align=3Dleft>Democratic Party outlines =
pro-war=20
agenda for US elections</DIV>
<DIV>
<H5>By Joe Kay </H5>
<H5>6 September 2006</H5>
<H5>[...]</H5>
The response from the Democratic Party is to argue =
that=20
they, not the Republicans, are the more consistent proponents of =
American=20
&#8220;national security&#8221; and &#8220;defense,&#8221; i.e., =
domestic repression and war.
[...]
These =
views were=20
outlined in &#8220;The Neo Con: The Bush Defense Record by the =
Numbers,&#8221; written by=20
Sharon Burke and Harlan Geer for an organization called The Third Way =
National=20
Security Project. The Third Way is a group set up to provide a =
&#8220;progressive&#8221;=20
gloss to right-wing policies. Burke is director of the National Security =
Project=20
and was a speechwriter for the Department of Defense under the Clinton=20
administration.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate =
Minority=20
Leader Harry Reid endorsed the report&#8212;a fact that makes clear that =
the policy it=20
outlines corresponds to the official line of the Democratic Party. It =
was=20
released formally at a press conference that included Reid, Democratic =
Senator=20
Dick Durbin, General Wesley Clark, and Burke.
The general attitude of the Democrats is made =
clear from the=20
very beginning of the report, which cites approvingly comments from =
William=20
Kristol, one of the leading ideological figures behind the militarism of =
the=20
Bush administration. It quotes Kristol as declaring: &#8220;North Korea =
is firing=20
missiles. Iran is going nuclear. Somalia is controlled by radical =
Islamists.=20
Iraq isn&#8217;t getting better, and Afghanistan is getting worse...I =
give the=20
president a lot of credit for hanging tough on Iraq. But I am worried =
that it=20
has made them too passive in confronting the other =
threats.&#8221;
This is more or less the position that the =
Democrats are=20
staking out. The occupation of Iraq&#8212;or rather, the way this =
occupation is being=20
carried out&#8212;is preventing the US government from dealing with more =
&#8220;pressing&#8221;=20
problems, particularly Iran. A new strategy is needed in Iraq, the =
Democrats=20
argue, in order to free the military to deal with these other=20
problems.
&#8220;The number of terrorist attacks and =
recruits are up=20
worldwide,&#8221; the report declares, &#8220;many of our enemies are =
stronger; their reach=20
is greater; their weapons of mass destruction are more developed, =
plentiful and=20
available. At the same time, American influence with our allies has =
weakened:=20
our &#8216;friends&#8217; are not with us in Iraq. And a prolonged and =
troop-intensive war=20
in Iraq has stretched the military and has left America less able to =
project=20
power in troublesome hot spots than before 9-11.&#8221;
On Iraq, the Third Way report highlights the =
crisis of the=20
American occupation, noting that the number of people killed&#8212;both =
Iraqis and=20
American soldiers&#8212;is rising. It declares that Iraq has become a =
&#8220;terrorist=20
haven&#8221; that is on the brink of &#8220;full-scale =
war.&#8221;
Burke and Geer do not present any alternative to =
the Bush=20
administration&#8217;s policy, and do not call for an end to the =
occupation. The main=20
position being advanced by the Democrats, however, is &#8220;strategic=20
redeployment&#8221;&#8212;the selective transfer of some troops to other =
areas of Iraq and=20
the Middle East. Other Democrats are floating the possibility of backing =
a=20
partition of the country, which would lead to violence and ethnic =
cleansing on a=20
massive scale.
On Tuesday, the Bush administration continued to =
heighten=20
threats against Iran, releasing a new &#8220;National Strategy for =
Combating=20
Terrorism&#8221; that declares Iran to be the &#8220;most active state =
sponsor of=20
international terrorism.&#8221; In a speech on Tuesday, Bush sought to =
equate the=20
government of Iran with Al Qaeda and declared, &#8220;The world&#8217;s =
free nations will=20
not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon.&#8221;
There is every reason to believe that the Bush=20
administration is preparing for some sort of military strike against =
Iran. What=20
will be the Democratic Party&#8217;s response? They would lend crucial =
support to such=20
an intervention. The Third Way report criticizes the Bush administration =
from=20
the right on Iran, denouncing it for having &#8220;outsourced the task =
of containing=20
Iran&#8217;s nuclear program to the Europeans and the =
UN.&#8221;
The Bush administration &#8220;has been =
unsuccessful in=20
restraining Iran,&#8221; it declares. &#8220;At best, Iran is using its =
nuclear ambition to=20
blackmail western powers into meeting Iranian demands for economic =
acceptance=20
and political influence. At worst, it is determined to possess these =
weapons to=20
establish itself as the leader of the Islamic world.&#8221;
The report also includes a section on China, in =
which it=20
states, &#8220;We may be losing a potential partner and gaining a =
serious rival.&#8221;=20
China has become &#8220;a powerful regional power broker, often acting =
against the=20
interests of America in the areas of North Korea and Iran,&#8221; as =
well as South=20
America and Africa. If the US were to take military action against Iran =
or North=20
Korea and this led to a confrontation with China, these statements are a =
clear=20
indication that the Democrats would support it.
One of the principal aims of the Democrats is to =
garner the=20
support of a section of the military that has become increasingly =
disaffected=20
with the Bush administration, and particularly Defense Secretary Donald=20
Rumsfeld. Leading Democrats have in recent days renewed calls for the =
Bush=20
administration to replace Rumsfeld. The disaffection comes from sections =
of the=20
military brass that are deeply worried that the military as an =
institution has=20
been severely undermined. Recruitment is sharply down. Morale is at =
all-time=20
lows. Large sections of the military are committed to the occupation of =
Iraq,=20
making it difficult for US imperialism to pose a credible threat to =
other=20
countries.
&#8220;Our superiority is unquestioned,&#8221; the =
Third Way report=20
declares. &#8220;But over the past four years, the President has =
stretched the=20
military to a crisis point.&#8221; The report cites many statistics that =
document this=20
crisis. A new strategy is needed, the authors conclude, to renew the =
strength of=20
American militarism.
One potential answer to what is seen by the =
Democrats as=20
inadequate troop strength is the reintroduction of the draft, a =
possibility that=20
was suggested by Representative John Murtha on Tuesday. Murtha is known =
for his=20
close ties to sections of the military.
Nowhere within the Third Way report, or in any of =
the=20
comments of leading Democrats, is there any discussion of the real aims =
of the=20
war in Iraq and the threats of war against Iran&#8212;namely, the =
seizure of oil and=20
other natural resources to give the American ruling class an advantage =
against=20
potential rivals, including China. There is no mention of these aims =
because the=20
Democratic Party accepts them and agrees with them.
The right-wing position being advanced by the =
Democrats=20
comes at a time when polls indicate that two-thirds of the population is =
against=20
the war in Iraq. The Democrats are once again demonstrating that they =
are=20
incapable of appealing to this sentiment. They have no desire to run in =
the=20
November elections on the basis of antiwar sentiment, since this would =
create=20
expectations that, being loyal defenders of the interests of American=20
imperialism, they would be unwilling to =
fulfill.</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0025_01C6D198.14B358D0--