[Peace-discussion] Impeachment ,if we have time, i'd like to have this on the agenda tonight.

Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:21:00 -0500

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01C77C2B.7C5DD2B0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Let's keep the discussion going on this but on the discussion list only,
untill 
such time as we have a proposed action happening.
Thanks,
joni
I finally found it!
this was from a while back but still something we as a committee needs to
adress.
With A28 coming up, perhaps we as gpax could be a visible impetus for
action?
http://a28.org/
I have also brought up the issue that the GPAX has not and still is

not doing anything to carry out the mandate in the July 19, 2003

Impeachment resolution, as follows:

"2. Constituting a subcommittee of the Peace Action Committee to plan

and to coordinate activities within the Green Party of the United

States and with other organizations working for the impeachment of

George W. Bush."

This is a clear and vital directive, amended to also include Cheney.

Has the GPAX even discussed it? Has the SC or the portfolio co-chair

of the GPAX done anything to see that this directive is carried out?

If this had been carried out, we could have been in the forefront of

this movement by now. There has been almost four years that we could

have been organizing it.

Is the ultimate responsibility for carrying out such mandate just on

the committee or is it the SC or is it the NC? 

We are or have missed a huge opportunity. Can we get it going? GPAX?

SC? NC? Who is going to take this up? Does anyone care that an

important NC directive has not been carried out, not even started?

Can someone on the SC and someone on the GPAX please talk about this?

The *hog-tied* statement cannot be an excuse in this situation,

because the GPAX was given about as strong a go-ahead by the NC as

I've ever seen, as documented in the resolution.

Morgen D'Arc

Maine Green Independent Party

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01C77C2B.7C5DD2B0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16414" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007>Let's =
keep the=20
discussion going on this but on the discussion list only, untill=20
</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007>such =
time as we have=20
a proposed action happening.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D203461716-11042007>Thanks,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D203461716-11042007>joni</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007>I =
finally found=20
it!</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007>this =
was from a=20
while back but still something we as a committee needs to=20
adress.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007>With =
A28 coming up,=20
perhaps we as gpax could be a visible impetus for =
action?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007><A=20
href=3D"http://a28.org/">http://a28.org/</A></SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D203461716-11042007><FONT =
size=3D2>
<P>I have also brought up the issue that the GPAX has not and still =
is</P>
<P>not doing anything to carry out the mandate in the July 19, 2003</P>
<P>Impeachment resolution, as follows:</P>
<P>"2. Constituting a subcommittee of the Peace Action Committee to =
plan</P>
<P>and to coordinate activities within the Green Party of the United</P>
<P>States and with other organizations working for the impeachment =
of</P>
<P>George W. Bush."</P>
<P>This is a clear and vital directive, amended to also include =
Cheney.</P>
<P>Has the GPAX even discussed it? Has the SC or the portfolio =
co-chair</P>
<P>of the GPAX done anything to see that this directive is carried =
out?</P>
<P>If this had been carried out, we could have been in the forefront =
of</P>
<P>this movement by now. There has been almost four years that we =
could</P>
<P>have been organizing it.</P>
<P>Is the ultimate responsibility for carrying out such mandate just =
on</P>
<P>the committee or is it the SC or is it the NC? </P>
<P>We are or have missed a huge opportunity. Can we get it going? =
GPAX?</P>
<P>SC? NC? Who is going to take this up? Does anyone care that an</P>
<P>important NC directive has not been carried out, not even =
started?</P>
<P>Can someone on the SC and someone on the GPAX please talk about =
this?</P>
<P>The *hog-tied* statement cannot be an excuse in this situation,</P>
<P>because the GPAX was given about as strong a go-ahead by the NC =
as</P>
<P>I've ever seen, as documented in the resolution.</P>
<P>Morgen D'Arc</P>
<P>Maine Green Independent =
Party</P></FONT></SPAN></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_008D_01C77C2B.7C5DD2B0--