[Peace-discussion] On the Nat'l. Expedited sponsorship of WCW event

Mon, 1 Jan 2007 15:39:48 -0600

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0068_01C72DBB.121CF390
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This may draw some similar fire.
My guess is, if we as gpax have a firm commitment towards action and 
expedited sponsorship, do we support that in our SC?
What if there's an org. we have real issues with?
How far does autonomy go?
Is the SC to be held to a different standard than we as an action committee
would like, being
that they're speaking for the Nat'l Party?
Nothings ever black and white, unfortunately, but i think as gpax we would
do well to discuss this, for
those of us that are able...
I'm thinking with good people and good goals and good kv's as a checkpoint
we/none of us should be holding others
back. My thought is, when compelled to flow, we should flow, when there's an
ebb we need to respect that as well.
These are my thoughts. What are Yours?
Peace,
joni

------=_NextPart_000_0068_01C72DBB.121CF390
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>This =
may draw some=20
similar fire.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>My =
guess is, if we=20
as gpax have a firm commitment towards action and </SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D156242021-01012007>expedited=20
sponsorship, do we support that in our SC?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>What =
if there's an=20
org. we have real issues with?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>How =
far does=20
autonomy go?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>Is the =
SC to be held=20
to a different standard than we as an action committee would&nbsp;like,=20
being</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>that =
they're=20
speaking for the Nat'l Party?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN =
class=3D156242021-01012007>Nothings ever black=20
and white, unfortunately, but i think as gpax we would do well to =
discuss this,=20
for</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>those =
of us that are=20
able...</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>I'm =
thinking with=20
good people and good goals and good kv's as a checkpoint we/none of us =
should be=20
holding others</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>back. =
My thought is,=20
when compelled to flow, we should flow, when there's an ebb we need to =
respect=20
that as well.</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN class=3D156242021-01012007>These =
are my=20
thoughts. What are Yours?</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D156242021-01012007>Peace,</SPAN></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><SPAN=20
class=3D156242021-01012007>joni</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0068_01C72DBB.121CF390--