[Peace-discussion] SC and reply on NC

Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:23:07 -0600

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00F8_01C72E81.E854A9F0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

............o....k..........I"M Really confused!
Another endorsement for an advocacy group that has not supported the Green

Party. I really don't grasp why this game is so critical to some while it

provides little in the way of real mutual support or the development of

political unity around a common strategy for the near future. All the talk

about fascism in WCW does not obscure that it has provided no real

leadership in the task of uniting broader sections of the American public in

political activity with some import and impact.

Do we have a legislative agenda listed that we will be handing out to

Congresspeople and passersby and are we making appointments to meet with

them that day from both parties to review it with them? When are we going to

include a transition to renewables as part of our strategic plan for US

security?

As far as the SC making the decision, it really doesn't matter to me, one

way or another. It's just more symbolism.

Mato Ska

NMGP

------=_NextPart_000_00F8_01C72E81.E854A9F0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.5730.11" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN=20
class=3D781312221-02012007>............o....k..........I"M Really=20
confused!</DIV>
<DIV>
Another endorsement for an advocacy group that has not supported the=20
Green
Party. I really don't grasp why this game is so critical to some =
while it
provides little in the way of real mutual support or the development =
of
political unity around a common strategy for the near future. All the =

talk
about fascism in WCW does not obscure that it has provided no =
real
leadership in the task of uniting broader sections of the American =
public=20
in
political activity with some import and impact.
Do we have a legislative agenda listed that we will be handing out =
to
Congresspeople and passersby and are we making appointments to meet =
with
them that day from both parties to review it with them? When are we =
going=20
to
include a transition to renewables as part of our strategic plan for =
US
security?
As far as the SC making the decision, it really doesn't matter to me, =
one
way or another. It's just more symbolism.
Mato Ska
NMGP</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00F8_01C72E81.E854A9F0--