Fw: [Pnp-wg] Specific apportionment plan

[Steve Greenfield]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Greenfield" <bicyclesax@earthlink.net>
To: <peterson@lakeland.ws>
Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 6:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Pnp-wg] Specific apportionment plan


> > Maybe you could try for both, Steve.
>
> I do, but I'm a native New Yorker and I have genetic limitations. Can't we
> acknowledge that under "respect for diversity?" (joke)
>
> I try. I really do.
>
> Steve
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Jeff Peterson" <peterson@lakeland.ws>
> To: "Steve Greenfield" <bicyclesax@earthlink.net>; <Pnp-wg@gp-us.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 5:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [Pnp-wg] Specific apportionment plan
>
>
> > Maybe you could try for both, Steve.
> >
> > Jeff Peterson
> > Wisconsin
> >
> > Steve Greenfield wrote:
> >
> > >Yes, of course, pleasant language is always more important than
> substance,
> > >and it must be enforced. How indifferent of me. Sorry.
> > >
> > >Steve
> > >----- Original Message ----- 
> > >From: "Jeff Peterson" <peterson@lakeland.ws>
> > >To: "Steve Greenfield" <bicyclesax@earthlink.net>; <Pnp-wg@gp-us.org>
> > >Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2005 4:11 PM
> > >Subject: Re: [Pnp-wg] Specific apportionment plan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >>After reading this little tirade, I don't think I can support you as
> > >>facilitator, Steve. I don't care how badly you want to save the Green
> > >>Party; this type of language is out of line.
> > >>
> > >>Are there any women on this list? If so I'd like to hear from them.
> > >>
> > >>Jeff Peterson
> > >>Wisconsin
> > >>
> > >>Steve Greenfield wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>Well, thanks for clearing that up. Now you force me to chuck the "all
> due
> > >>>respect" part because none is due.
> > >>>
> > >>>You obviously don't take this process seriously, or worse yet, are
> openly
> > >>>hostile to it.
> > >>>
> > >>>The Coordinating Committee of the Green Party of the United States
> formed
> > >>>this committee to study and improve the Presidential Nominating
> Process,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >and
> > >
> > >
> > >>>that is what we will do.
> > >>>
> > >>>Approximately 350,000 Greens and the future of progressive politics
in
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >this
> > >
> > >
> > >>>country depend on a satisfactory outcome to this process.
> > >>>
> > >>>If you have some other agenda, or some problem that interferes with
> your
> > >>>ability to contribute and/or "work and play well with others" then
you
> > >>>should resign and let the adults try to have a productive
conversation.
> > >>>
> > >>>Steve Greenfield
> > >>>New York
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Pnp-wg mailing list
> > >Pnp-wg@lists.gp-us.org
> > >http://lists.gp-us.org/mailman/listinfo/pnp-wg
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> > multipart/alternative
> >   text/plain (text body -- kept)
> >   text/html
> > ---
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pnp-wg mailing list
> > Pnp-wg@lists.gp-us.org
> > http://lists.gp-us.org/mailman/listinfo/pnp-wg
> >
>