2005-March Archives by Author

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Mar 1 00:51:43 2005
Ending: Thu Mar 31 23:37:04 2005
Messages: 455

• [Pnp-wg] group members   Anita
• [Pnp-wg] Another suggestion for voting strength   Anita
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Anita
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Minimum Delegation Size and Maximum Convention Size   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator nominations Suggested Timeline   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Nader / Camejo   Elizabeth Arnone
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Unique situation of 2004   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Fw: 2004 election and voter numbers   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Belated introduction   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Re:members   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Fw: question   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Problem   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] group members   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Re:members   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Dual convention idea   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] group members   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] This exchange   Elizabeth Arnone
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] This exchange   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Another suggestion for voting strength   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] re: proposal   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Forward-Looking: Apportionment, Ballot Access, Pre-Convention Decisions   Elizabeth Arnone
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Elizabeth Arnone
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Better communication   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] Off Topic "Moving Day 6/21/05"   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] On civility and getting back on track.   Elizabeth Arnone
• [Pnp-wg] proposal to eliminate a "no candidate" outcome   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] Clearing Misconceptions   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator- Gender Balance?   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Owen Broadhurst
• [Pnp-wg] group members   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] Process of finding candidates   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] FW: 2008   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Charlie
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04process was rigged')   Charlie
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Fred
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Fred
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   Fred
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Fred
• [Pnp-wg] Defining Members   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option- Floor Rules   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Gary
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Gary
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Something Easy FOr Once   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Gary
• [Pnp-wg] Chicken or the Egg   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Nominees for Facilitators   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] population based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] IPC   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Procedural Question- And another One   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] A Floor Rules Proposal   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Dual convention idea   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Defining Members   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Analysis of 2004 Formula   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] A few announcements   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (was No Endorsement)   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (was NoEndorsement)   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (was NoEndorsement)   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Lies and statistics   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Lies and statistics   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] RI numbers   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] FW: 2008   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Another suggestion for voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• State primaries, was Re: Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Democrat Screening?   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] report to =?ISO-8859-1?B?x8c=?=   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] On civility and getting back on track.   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] response to options   Greg Gerritt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal to eliminate a "no candidate" outcome   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Minimum Delegation Size and Maximum Convention Size   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] And on the Asshole Side   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] And on the Other Side   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Anita Wessling withdraws nomination   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator- Gender Balance?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Trial Balloon Apportionment Formula   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Voting For Facilitator- PLEASE READ CAREFULLY   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Trial Balloon Apportionment Formula   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] For those who care to read   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Dual convention idea   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] group members   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Observation about ballot access   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Interesting Supreme Court decision   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Analysis of 2004 Formula   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Analysis of 2004 Formula   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] voting strength   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Greenfield
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] This exchange   Steve Greenfield
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] No endorsement option   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (was No Endorsement)   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (was NoEndorsement)   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: The truth (No Endorsement)   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Lies and statistics   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Lies and statistics   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: State primaries   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: State primaries   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Democrat Screening?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Democrat Screening?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] virtual convention   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04process was rigged")   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: language   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04process was rigged')   Steve Greenfield
• [Pnp-wg] And on the Lighter Side   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Minimum Delegation Size and Maximum Convention Size   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Nader / Camejo   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Nominees for Facilitators   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Voting For Facilitator   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Emailing: constitution-and-bylaws   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Woops   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Oregon constitution-and-bylaws   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] Process of finding candidates   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   George Grosch
• [Pnp-wg] And on the Lighter Side   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] And on the Other Side   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Procedural Question- And another One   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator- Gender Balance?   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] Voting For Facilitator- PLEASE READ CAREFULLY   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Gary R. Hecker
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator   Forrest Hill
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Forrest Hill
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Forrest Hill
• Consideration of the past, or not; was Re: [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Forrest Hill
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Forrest Hill
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Forrest Hill
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Forrest Hill
• [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   Forrest Hill
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Forrest Hill
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] proposal   Forrest Hill
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Forrest Hill
• [Pnp-wg] Minimum Delegation Size and Maximum Convention Size   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Clearing Misconceptions   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Vote   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Membership Defenition and Relevance   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Straight Vote Total Proposal   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] NOTA, Endorsement, Etc.   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Forward-Looking: Apportionment, Ballot Access, Pre-Convention Decisions   Phil Huckelberry
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] On civility and getting back on track.   Phil Huckelberry
• [Pnp-wg] group members   Tom King
• [Pnp-wg] Re: The truth (No Endorsement)   Tom King
• [Pnp-wg] And on the Lighter Side   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Nominees for Facilitators   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] more Milwaukee   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Voting For Facilitator- Consensus   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] For those who care to read   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Facilitator Consensus   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Dual convention idea   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Unique situation of 2004   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: constitution-and-bylaws   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: constitution-and-bylaws   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Analysis of 2004 Formula   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Analysis of 2004 Formula   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: proposal   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: proposal   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] voting strength   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: no endorsment option   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: The truth (No Endorsement)   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Truth and teamwork   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Gary's idea   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Getting back on track   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Better communication   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] Re: language   Kirit
• [Pnp-wg] To Steve, from Steve   Steve Kramer
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Trial Balloon Apportionment Formula   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Trial Balloon Apportionment Formula   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Steve Kramer
• Consideration of the past, or not; was Re: [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Radical idea for nomination process (was: Re: More on delegations)   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] A few announcements   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] A few announcements   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Proposed rules of discussion and consensus   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Kramer
• Other opinions requested, was Re: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Steve Kramer
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Web site updated, agenda items   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] From the Proposal   Steve Kramer
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Proposal language   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Kramer
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Kramer
• State primaries, was Re: Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Re: State primaries   Steve Kramer
• Getting back on track, was Re: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Democrat Screening?   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] report to =?ISO-8859-1?B?x8c=?=   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Outline of options   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Outline of options   Steve Kramer
• [Pnp-wg] Our discourse   Steve Kramer
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   James M Leas
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   James M Leas
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] proposal   James M Leas
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   James M Leas
• Fw: Re: Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   James M Leas
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   James M Leas
• Fw: Re: Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   James M Leas
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   James M Leas
• [Pnp-wg] Dual convention idea   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Thomas Leavitt
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] More on delegations ...   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Unique situation of 2004   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Radical idea for nomination process (was: Re: More on delegations)   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Re:members   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] group members   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Thomas Leavitt
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] proposal   Thomas Leavitt
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] No endorsement option   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Process of finding candidates   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Thomas Leavitt
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (was NoEndorsement)   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] The truth about Green Party decline (wasNoEndorsement)   Thomas Leavitt
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Thomas Leavitt
• Fwd: [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04process was rigged")   Thomas Leavitt
• [Pnp-wg] population based apportionment   Jonah McAllister-Erickson
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Jonah McAllister-Erickson
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Jonah McAllister-Erickson
• [Pnp-wg] Re: proposal   Jonah McAllister-Erickson
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Jonah McAllister-Erickson
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Jonah McAllister-Erickson
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Scott McLarty
• [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Unique situation of 2004   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Unique situation of 2004   Jeff Peterson
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Jeff Peterson
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Jeff Peterson
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Jeff Peterson
• Fw: [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] This exchange   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] NOTA, Endorsement, Etc.   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Democrat Screening?   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   Jeff Peterson
• [Pnp-wg] Voting For Facilitator   Julie Sawtelle
• [Pnp-wg] Belated introduction   Julie Sawtelle
• [Pnp-wg] Maine's data   Julie Sawtelle
• [Pnp-wg] virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   Julie Sawtelle
• [Pnp-wg] virtual convention   Julie Sawtelle
• [Pnp-wg] virtual nominations/live convention   Julie Sawtelle
• [Pnp-wg] population based apportionment   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Green prospects   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Anita Wessling withdraws nomination   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Facilitator Consensus   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Re:members   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Re:members   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] No endorsement option   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] no endorsment option   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Arkansas info   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Another suggestion for voting strength   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Re: State primaries   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Outline of options   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] On civility and getting back on track.   Mark Swaney
• [Pnp-wg] Defining Members   corvallisgeorge@comcast.net
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly "So the '04 process was rigged")   corvallisgeorge@comcast.net
• [Pnp-wg] Off Topic "Moving Day 6/21/05"   corvallisgeorge@comcast.net
• [Pnp-wg] Nominations for Facilitator   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] Re:proposal   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] This exchange   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] 2008   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] Process of finding candidates   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] Democrat Screening?   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] Re: Outline of options   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention   kamva@allvantage.com
• [Pnp-wg] Re: On civility and getting back on track.   kamva@allvantage.com
• Fw: Re: [Pnp-wg] Essay proving need for membership-based apportionment   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] members? please respond   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] Analysis of 2004 Formula   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] proposal   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] Why not be a Democrat?   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] Re: virtual convention ? (formerly 'So the '04 process was rigged')   peterson@lakeland.ws
• [Pnp-wg] Political Scientists, Crosscultural and Historical Comparisons, Green Praxis   jamais vu'
• [Pnp-wg] Sense of the meeting, 12 March   jamais vu'
• [Pnp-wg] On civility and getting back on track.   jamais vu'

Last message date: Thu Mar 31 23:37:04 2005
Archived on: Thu Mar 31 15:28:01 2005

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ date ]
• More info on this list...