[Pnp-wg] Test For Consensus on NOTA and No Candidate
Charlie
oldbogus@ris.net
Mon, 16 May 2005 14:25:23 -0600
At a convention, NC and NOTA would be the same. NOTA defaults to NC if it wins.
I agree NC should be a [bad] choice.
Charlie Green
GPCO
Gary wrote:
>
> Here's another one:
>
> Some swing states, such as FL, showed significant support for No Candidate. While I personally disagree with this philosophy, to fairly and accurately represent the membership, No Candidate should be on any GPUS ballot. The leadership can, of course, express its desire to run a full out campaign, and encourage members to help select a good candidate rather than sit out the election.
>
> Same with NOTA.
>
> Neither of these issues should arise if we have good candidates, and a well informed membership. We need to respect other opinions, however, and I don't see how we can leave NOTA and No Candidate OFF of any ballot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary
> FL
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pnp-wg mailing list
> Pnp-wg@lists.gp-us.org
> http://lists.gp-us.org/mailman/listinfo/pnp-wg
>