[Texgreen] Action Alert: Stop Commercial Bioprospecting in Our National Parks
margaret
max104@io.com
Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:50:18 -0600
Urgent Action Alert: Share widely
Stop Commercial Bioprospecting in Our National Parks!
Sound Off to the Park Service by December 15th.
Help stop commercial bioprospecting in National Parks by sending your
comment letter to the Park Service today (deadline for comments is
December 15, 2006).
>> Click here for a ready-made letter you can instantly send:
http://www.democracyinaction.org/dia/organizationsORG/PEER/
campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=2663&t=sign-a-petition.dwt
or
>> Review our Comment Points to write your own letter:
http://www.parksnotforsale.org/comment.html
Support Alternative "C"
- --
http://www.parksnotforsale.org/
Press Release, October 4, 2006:
National Park Service to Allow Commercial "Bioprospecting" in Parks
Public Interest Groups Cry Foul
What is Commercial Bioprospecting?
Bioprospecting is, quite literally, prospecting for microscopic
resources, the genetic and biochemical information found in wild
plants, animals, and microorganisms. Uses of products developed from
material discovered through bioprospecting include a wide array of
consumer products, industrial remedies, and pharmaceuticals.
As the demand for bioprospecting has grown, so have the places from
which the bioprospecting companies have sought to extract organisms,
including Yellowstone National Park. Yellowstone Park scientists have
discovered, for example, that the Park's thermal features contain a
microbial community with a biological diversity similar in degree to
tropical rainforests.
Background
In late September the National Park Service (NPS) made another bold
step toward the commercialization of the natural resources in our
National Parks. Specifically, the Park Service released its
court-ordered Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that could
clear the way for corporations to "bioprospect" for microorganisms in
national parks like Yellowstone. If the Park Service gets its way,
corporations will be allowed to mine, exploit, patent, and profit from
living organisms that we are supposed to be stewarding.
The controversy of bioprospecting in the national parks first came to
light, interestingly enough, during the ceremony commemorating the
125th anniversary of Yellowstone National Park in August 1997. During
the ceremony, the Park Service announced that it had entered into an
agreement with the Diversa Corporation to give Diversa a "non-exclusive
right to 'bioprospect' microorganisms in Yellowstone in exchange for an
agreement to share potential financial returns (i.e. benefits sharing)
with the Park.
That announcement was met with a lawsuit filed in 1998 by the Edmonds
Institute, the Alliance for Wild Rockies, and the International Center
for Technology Assessment, who opposed commercial bioprospecting and -
at the least - called for an environmental assessment of its
consequences. In 1999, Judge Royce Lamberth of the U.S. District Court
for the District of Columbia, ruled in favor of the public interest
groups, suspended the agreement between the Park Service and Diversa,
and ordered an environmental assessment in accordance with the
requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act. Now, seven years
later, the Park Service has published the court-ordered environmental
assessment, entitled "Benefits-Sharing," and opened a 90-day public
comment period. [link: Download the DEIS (pdf) here]
The Park Service's DEIS outlines three possible plans of action: A) No
action, thus allowing continued bioprospecting without the so-called
benefit-sharing agreements; B) To allow commercial bioprospecting but
require benefits-sharing agreements and some degree of public
disclosure; and C) prohibit commercial bioprospecting, only allowing
noncommercial or public interest research and development of nation
park resources.
As a result, a group of organizations, including Edmonds Institute,
Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER), Alliance for
Wild Rockies, and Wilderness Watch, have launched a national grassroots
initiative to educate the public on the Park Service's actions and to
encourage the public to rally against commercial bioprospecting in
national parks. Initially, the campaign seeks to generate public
comments on the DEIS that support "option C."
- - - another article - - -
Bioprospecting: Mining Our National Parks One Gene at a Time
By Geov Parrish, AlterNet. Posted November 28, 2006.
"More to the point, these resources are not the federal government's to
sell: They belong to all of us. And most especially to the point, there
are some things that simply shouldn't be for sale. Life is an obvious
one. It's one thing to sell chickens; it's another to sell the
exclusive rights to Gallus gallus. The only difference here is size.
Only a few weeks remain for public comment on the NPS proposal. Take
some time to weigh in."
read whole article
http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/44654/