[Texgreen] Iraq needs privatization to really prosper
Roger Baker
rcbaker@eden.infohwy.com
Sun, 1 Jul 2007 19:00:10 -0500
Wonderful news for the people of Iraq. Why didn't somebody think of
this privatization concept sooner? -- Roger
*******************************************************
<http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/07/01/
cniraq101.xml>
"... An executive at one of the smaller Western oil companies
operating in Iraq said: "As you would expect, most of Iraq's non-oil
assets are outdated and in pretty bad shape. But this would give
people who wanted to operate in Iraq an opportunity to get in." The
source added that Iraq's nationalised cement industry could be
particularly attractive because the country's reconstruction will
require a building bonanza.
However, sources cautioned that the move could simply be a sop to the
American administration. The US Congress will consider a report on
progress in Iraq in September and a privatisation programme could be
presented as some kind of progress in lieu of any real improvement in
the security situation. City sources said any instruction would be
complicated by factionalism within Iraq's fragmented government.
Hariri, while not ethnically Kurdish, is a member of the Kurdish
democratic party.
Experts said investor appetite for Iraqi assets was relatively
limited and was likely to remain so until the country's security
improved considerably. But if attempts to privatise Iraq's non-oil
assets went hand in hand with moves to open up the country's oil
sector to foreign investment, they would have much greater appeal.
The long-awaited passage of the hydrocarbon law is seen as critical
to attracting foreign investment.
Smaller, maverick oil companies have already invested in Kurdish-
controlled areas of Iraq, but the bulk of the oil is in the south and
no oil major would consider investing without a reliable legal regime
and a significant improvement in security."